Survey drone hits tower crane in Manchester despite avoidance system

An AAIB bulletin says the aircraft fell about 120 metres after striking a crane during a pre-selected aerial survey; no formal investigation was opened.

A surveying drone struck the top of a tower crane at a construction site in the Cheetham Hill area of Manchester in August, according to the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB). The drone fell about 120 metres to the ground after the collision.

The AAIB said the unmanned aircraft was carrying out an aerial survey on a pre-selected flight path over an urban construction site. Its obstacle avoidance feature was enabled, but the drone still hit the crane.

The incident was reported to the AAIB, but no formal investigation was opened. The site and the contractor were not identified in the bulletin.

An internal investigation by the construction company found that the company and its remote pilots may not have fully understood the limitations of the obstacle avoidance software, the AAIB said. The finding points to a possible gap between relying on automated safety features and understanding how they perform around large structures.

The case highlights the need for survey flights in built-up areas to account for crane heights, flight-path planning and the limits of onboard sensors when automated avoidance is used. It also underscores the importance of pilot training and pre-flight checks before operating near tall structures. The AAIB bulletin did not say whether anyone was injured or whether the drone caused damage beyond the fall.

NO

Nadia Okonkwo

Nadia Okonkwo is a fall-protection systems editor covering full-body harnesses, energy-absorbing lanyards, self-retracting lifelines, anchor connectors, and rescue kits for construction and industrial work at height. Her articles explain fall-clearance calculations, free-fall distance, arrest force, anchorage requirements, and inspection intervals using ANSI/ASSP Z359.14, EN 361, and OSHA 29 CFR 1926.502 in their applicable scope. She helps construction safety leads, height-work planners, and equipment buyers compare system components, verify documentation, and plan rescue and inspection routines without treating any product as universally compliant.