How Germany's Deposit Return Scheme Built a 99% Aluminium Can Recycling Rate

Germany's Pfand system pairs a EUR 0.25 deposit with retail take-back and standardised container identification to keep used beverage cans in dedicated recycling streams.

Germany reports a 99 per cent recycling rate for used aluminium beverage cans, the highest position in the comparison published under an International Aluminium Institute (IAI) study. The same material places German PET bottle recycling at 95 per cent and glass bottle recycling at 81 per cent, against an overall European packaging recycling rate of 76.3 per cent. Aluminium cans sit at the top of that table, and the system widely credited with keeping them there is the country's Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), known domestically as Pfand.

How the deposit system works

Germany's single-use beverage deposit system was built in stages rather than introduced in one step. The mandatory deposit requirement was decided in 2003. Two years later, retailers and the drinks industry jointly set up Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH (DPG) to create a standardised framework for implementing it. The nationwide DPG system for single-use beverage packaging began operating in May 2006, supported by an extended take-back obligation that required the new arrangements to be in place from 1 May that year. The stated goal was an efficient system built on common standards, while leaving retailers, drinks companies and other market participants to manage their own roles.

Under the scheme, consumers pay a deposit of EUR 0.25 (USD 0.28) on eligible single-use beverage containers and recover it when they return the empty packaging to an accepted collection point. Retail take-back, reverse-vending machines and standardised container identification have made returns part of routine shopping. According to DPG material cited in the coverage, the system now handles around 20 billion containers a year, making it the largest one-way deposit-return system in the European Union, with more than 1,000 companies affiliated as participants and partners.

Why the deposit matters for aluminium

The advantage for aluminium is not only the number of cans returned. The refundable deposit creates a dedicated, recurring stream of used beverage cans that enters organised collection and recycling channels instead of disappearing into mixed waste. The EUR 0.25 refund gives consumers a direct financial reason to bring containers back, while retail take-back and reverse-vending machines make the process convenient. Container recognition and standardised identification help separate eligible packaging into distinct collection streams.

Taken together, these features produce a substantial and repeating flow of packaging for recovery. A refundable deposit also helps limit material loss, because it encourages consumers to keep eligible containers out of ordinary disposal routes where their value would be harder to capture.

The recycling capacity behind the scheme

Collection performance sits alongside a sizeable domestic recycled aluminium industry. The supplied material estimates Germany's national recycled aluminium capacity at roughly 700,000–720,000 tonnes a year. Several operations illustrate how that capacity connects to the collection system:

  • Novelis, Nachterstedt — described in the material as the world's largest aluminium recycling facility, with capacity to process up to 400,000 tonnes of aluminium scrap annually.
  • WMR Recycling GmbH, Dormagen (Hydro-owned) — supplies technology-driven sorting equipment and can sort 36,000 tonnes of aluminium scrap a year, using X-ray transmission and other sorting technologies.
  • Trimet Aluminium SE, Gelsenkirchen — has expanded its recycling facility, lifting production capacity by 20 per cent to 80,000 tonnes of recycled aluminium.

These operations point to the link between collection and industrial recovery. The deposit scheme brings containers into organised channels; sorting and recycling facilities then prepare the recovered metal for further use. Collection and processing work as complementary parts of the same system rather than as separate stories.

Two decades of DRS — and the boundaries of the model

The scheme's 20-year milestone was marked at anniversary celebrations in Berlin on 17 June 2026, where the European Commission and Germany's Federal Environment Ministry highlighted its contribution to the circular economy. EU Commissioner for the Environment Jessika Roswall praised the system's role in making packaging returns routine, saying that all packaging — glass bottles, plastic bottles or aluminium cans — should be sent for recycling to increase efficiency, reduce waste and protect the environment. Antje von Broock, Head of the Department for Circular Economy, Air Pollution Control and Chemical Safety at the Federal Environment Ministry, said the deposit-refund system makes a very important contribution to the circular economy today. DPG Managing Director Susanne Kürschner pointed to the system's development over time, noting that the organisation and its partners had kept it stable while making it "more efficient — resilient, future-proof and scalable."

It is worth being precise about what the deposit scheme does and does not cover. DRS provides a dedicated route for eligible single-use beverage containers. Other packaging remains subject to separate collection and compliance arrangements, including household sorting through the Dual System commonly associated with the Grüner Punkt. The 99 per cent figure is a reported recycling rate drawn from IAI material rather than an independently verified measurement, and the capacity figures for individual plants are the operators' own descriptions. Even so, as Europe looks to strengthen packaging circularity, Germany's two-decade record offers a documented example of how a collection system can connect consumer behaviour with aluminium can recycling.

NN

Naledi Nkosi

Naledi Nkosi covers material and assembly testing, fire-rated door evidence, moisture and strength verification, and lifecycle documentation for building products and fixed systems. Her work distinguishes laboratory test scope from field conditions, using named methods such as ASTM E119 for assemblies and measurable parameters like compressive strength, moisture content, and air leakage where a documented specimen applies. She helps specifiers, general contractors, quality teams, and property owners decide which tests, submittals, and substitutions require further evidence before procurement, installation, or retrofit.